<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Soil and Plant Interactions</title>
<title_fa>روابط خاک و گیاه</title_fa>
<short_title>Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions</short_title>
<subject></subject>
<web_url>http://jspi.iut.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>18</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>agent2</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2783-5014</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2783-5286</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1402</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2023</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>14</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>امکان‌سنجی کاربرد کمپوست ضایعات درخت خرما در بستر کشت نشاء گوجه‌فرنگی در شرایط گلخانه</title_fa>
	<title>The Possibility of Using Palm Wastes Compost in Tomato Seedling Cultivation Substrate in Greenhouse Condition</title>
	<subject_fa>روابط خاک (بستر رشد) و گياه در كشت‌هاي گلخانه‌اي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Soil (growth medium) and plant relations in greenhouse culture</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>گوجه&#8204;&#8204;فرنگی از مهم&#8204;ترین گیاهان زراعی است که کشت آن به&#8204;صورت نشایی است. انتخاب بستر کشت اقتصادی و مطلوب برای تولید نشاء با کیفیت اهمیت دارد. بنابراین به&#8204;منظور استفاده از کمپوست&#8204; تولیدشده از ضایعات هرس درخت خرما (برگ و دمبرگ) به&#8204;عنوان بستر تولید نشاء گوجه&#8204;فرنگی در شرایط گلخانه&#8204;ای، آزمایشی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با پنج تیمار شامل انواع بسترهای کاشت در سه تکرار در سال زراعی 99-1398 در گلخانه پژوهشی مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب اجرا شد. تیمارها (بسترهای کاشت) شامل: 1) کمپوست تولیدشده از ضایعات هرس درخت خرما (پالم&#8204;پیت) (PP)، 2) پیت&#8204;ماس (PM)، 3) کوکوپیت (CP)، 4) مخلوط پالم&#8204;پیت و پیت&#8204;ماس (PP+PM)، و 5) مخلوط کوکوپیت و پیت&#8204;ماس (CP+PM) بود. پس از کشت نشاء گوجه&#8204;فرنگی داده&#8204;برداری و میزان جذب عناصر گیاه و شاخص&#8204;های رشد گیاه در انتهای دوره رشد اندازه&#8204;گیری شده و تجزیه آماری نتایج با نرم&#8204;افزار SAS به همراه تحلیل و بررسی اقتصادی انجام شد. بررسی آماری نتایج تجزیه گیاه (نشاء گوجه&#8204;فرنگی) نشان داد بیش&#8204;ترین غلظت نیتروژن، فسفر و پتاسیم (1/47 درصد نیتروژن، 0/18 درصد فسفر و 2/83 درصد پتاسیم) به&#8204;ترتیب در تیمارهای پیت&#8204;ماس، ترکیب کوکوپیت و پیت&#8204;ماس و پالم&#8204;پیت مشاهده شد که نسبت به بقیه تیمارها در سطح یک درصد معنی&#8204;دار شد. از نظر ارتفاع، نشاء گوجه&#8204;&#8204;فرنگی بهترین تیمار پیت&#8204;ماس (8/34 سانتی&#8204;متر) بود و تیمار پالم&#8204;پیت (7/56 سانتی&#8204;متر) و ترکیب پالم&#8204;پیت و پیت&#8204;ماس (7/56 سانتی&#8204;متر) مشترکاً در رده دوم قرار گرفتند. کم&#8204;ترین ارتفاع نشاء از تیمار کوکوپیت (5/37 سانتی&#8204;متر) بدست آمد. بیش&#8204;ترین طول ریشه (8/69 سانتی&#8204;متر) مربوط به تیمار پالم&#8204;پیت + پیت&#8204;ماس و کم&#8204;ترین مقدار آن (6/62 سانتی&#8204;متر) در تیمار کوکوپیت بود و اختلاف این دو تیمار در سطح یک درصد معنی&#8204;دار شد. مقایسه اقتصادی انواع بسترهای کشت در پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که هزینه هر لیتر پالم&#8204;پیت مناسب تولید داخل نسبت به کوکوپیت 50 درصد و نسبت به پیت&#8204;ماس 100 درصد ارزان&#8204;تر تمام می&#8204;شود و می&#8204;تواند به&#8204;عنوان جایگزین کوکوپیت و پیت&#8204;ماس وارداتی در نشاءکاری گوجه&#8204;فرنگی استفاده شود.</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;page-break-after:auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:130%&quot;&gt;&lt;span sans-serif=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:Arial,&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:130%&quot;&gt;Abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background:whitesmoke&quot;&gt;Tomato is one of the most important crops, which is cultivated as seedlings. It is important to choose an economic and favorable cultivation medium for the production of good seedlings. In order t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;o use the compost produced from palm pruning wastes as a substrate for the production of tomato seedlings, an experiment was carried out in the greenhouse conditions as completely randomized design with three replications in 2019-2018 at the research greenhouse of Soil and Water Research Institute. Five cultivation beds as treatments included: 1) compost produced from palm pruning wastes (palm peat) (PP), 2) peat moss (PM), 3) cocopeat (CP), 4) mixture of palm peat and peat moss (PP+PM), and 5) mixture of cocopeat and peat moss (CP+PM). Some plant indices, the concentration of plant nutrients and plant growth indicators were measured at the end of the growth period. The results showed that the highest amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (1.47% nitrogen, 0.18% phosphorus and 2.83% potassium) were observed in PM, CP and PP+PM treatments, respectively, which were significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01) different from other treatments. In terms of tomato seedling height, the best treatment was PM (8.34 cm), and PP (7.56 cm) and PP+PM (7.56 cm) were ranked second. The lowest seedling height was recorded in CP (5.37 cm). The highest and lowest values of root length were related to PP+PM (8.69 cm) and CP (6.62 cm), respectively, that were significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01) different. The economic results evaluation showed that palm peat is 50% cheaper than cocopeat and 100% cheaper than peat moss, and it can be used as a substitute for imported cocopeat and peat moss in tomato seedling cultivation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:364.7pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Background and Objective:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt; Tomato is one of the most important agricultural crops and has the second rank among vegetables in the country, with a cultivated area of over 131,000 hectares (1). At present, tomato seedling cultivation and preparation of seedlings are the most important stages of production.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Providing materials and high cost of cultivation bed are among the most important problems of seedling production in soilless cultivation (2). Currently, the materials used for the soilless cultivation are peat moss and cocopeat, both of which are imported, and besides increasing the cost of transplanting production, it also causes export problems. In this study, compost (peat) prepared from the pruned palm leaves was used as a seedling growing substrate and compared with other common cultivation beds. This is effective not only in reducing the cost of tomato seedling production, but also in the optimal use of palm tree pruning wastes, and would&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;create income for palm tree farmers and cultivation bed producers. The purpose of this research was to compare the cultivation medium produced from the wastes of palm leaves and petioles (palm peat) with imported cocopeat and peat moss, and to investigate its quantitative and qualitative effect on the growth indicators of tomato seedlings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Methods:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt; The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications in a controlled environment in the research greenhouse of Soil and Water Research Institute in 2019.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Chemical properties such as pH, salinity, the amounts of ammonium and nitrate, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and soluble sodium, cation exchange capacity, organic carbon content and micronutrients (copper, zinc, iron and manganese) were determined in the soil and plant samples. Five planting cultivation beds as treatments included: 1) compost produced from palm pruning wastes (palm peat) (PP), 2) peat moss (PM), 3) cocopeat (CP), 4) mixture of palm peat and peat moss (PP+PM), and 5) mixture of cocopeat and peat moss (CP+PM). Some plant indices, the concentration of plant nutrients and plant growth indicators were measured at the end of the growth period.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;RTL&quot; lang=&quot;FA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:14.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;B Lotus&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Results:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;The highest salinity was related to PM which was within the optimal range of salinity (i.e., 0.5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&amp;ndash;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;3 dS/m) provided by Gilmar and Betina (3). The pH value in the saturated extract was within the optimal range (5.5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&amp;ndash;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;6.5) for PM and CP and was more than optimal in PP. The results showed that the highest amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (1.47% nitrogen, 0.18% phosphorus and 2.83% potassium) were observed in PM, CP and PP+PM treatments, respectively, which were significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01) different from other treatments. The mean comparison of the chemical properties and nutritional elements of the cultivated substrates showed that T1 was richer in nutrients than PM or CP. The highest seedling height related to PM and PP was in the second rank. The highest stem fresh weight belonged to PP+PM, and PP ranked second. Palm peat treatment (PP) resulted in the highest concentrations of copper, zinc and iron in the whole plant.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;RTL&quot; lang=&quot;FA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:14.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;B Lotus&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;Conclusions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;: Seedling growth in peat moss compared to palm peat showed the suitability of chemical conditions including pH and nutrients in peat moss for optimal seedling growth. Despite the appropriate physical conditions and pH, cocopeat could not produce a good rating of growth due to the lower content of nutrients. Palm peat has a favorable potential in production of tomato seedlings, and due to its availability and low-cost production, it can be replaced instead of expensive peat moss and imported cocopeat.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;RTL&quot; lang=&quot;FA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:14.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;B Lotus&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;References:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;1. Agricultural Statistics, 2018. Volume Three: Horticultural Products. Information and Communication Technology Center, Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs, Tehran, Iran, 207 p.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;RTL&quot; lang=&quot;FA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:14.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;B Lotus&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;2. Basirat, M., 2011. Use of palm waste cellulose as a substitute for common growing media in aglonema growing. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Horticultural Plants&lt;/i&gt; 1(1): 1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&amp;ndash;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;11.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;tab-stops:14.2pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;3. Gilmar, S., Betina, L., 2022. Physical and chemical characteristics and analysis of plant substrate. &lt;i&gt;Ornamental Horticulture&lt;/i&gt; 28: 249&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;&amp;ndash;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt&quot;&gt;260.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>بستر کشت, ضایعات نخل, کمپوست, گوجه‌فرنگی, نشاکاری.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Cultivation bed, Palm waste, Compost, Tomato, Transplanting.</keyword>
	<start_page>81</start_page>
	<end_page>92</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jspi.iut.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2078-1&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>H.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Saffari</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>حسین</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>صفاری</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>hosaffary@yahoo.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-5147</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>H.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Sajjadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>هرمز</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>سجادی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>shsajjadi@yahoo.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
